Ending the Syrian War
Syria is currently the world’s greatest humanitarian catastrophe and most dangerous geopolitical hotspot.
The Syrian people are caught in a bloodbath, with more than 400,000 dead and ten million displaced.
Violent jihadist groups backed by outside patrons mercilessly ravage the country and prey on the population. All parties to the conflict – President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, the anti-Assad forces supported by the United States and its allies, and the Islamic State – have committed, and continue to commit, serious war crimes.
Ending the war requires adherence to six principles
- The US should cease both overt and covert operations to overthrow Syria’s government.
- The UN Security Council should implement the ceasefire now under negotiation, calling on all countries to stop arming and funding military forces within Syria.
- All paramilitary activities should cease, including those of so-called “moderates” backed by the US.
- The US and Russia – and, indeed, the UN Security Council – should hold Syria’s government strictly responsible to desist from punitive actions against regime opponents.
- The political transition should take place gradually and with confidence building on all sides, rather than through an arbitrary, destabilizing rush to “free elections.”
- The Gulf States, Turkey, and Iran should be pressed to negotiate face to face on a regional framework that can ensure lasting peace.
Read the full article on Project Syndicate website
Related Articles
António Guterres’ risky balancing act
10/31/2019. Nearly at the end of the first three of his five-year mandate, Guterres’ performance at the head of an embattled UN remains the subject of much anxious debate.
Syria: The proliferation of diplomatic initiatives comes up against the reality of power relations
02/12/2016. The view of Didier Billion, deputy Director of IRIS
Humanitarian Principles: 50 years after their adoption, myth or effectiveness?
10/14/2015. This video (in french) raises the issue: 50 years later, humanitarian principles they still reflect a philosophy or is it that this philosophy is exceeded?