In Defense of Philanthrocapitalism
When Mark Zuckerberg, the C.E.O. of Facebook, announced that he would be donating ninety-nine per cent of his Facebook stock to a new nonprofit organization, he got his share of positive headlines.
But the move was also dismissed as a tax-avoidance scheme, a public-relations gambit, a way to boost Facebook’s profits under the guise of doing good, and the latest expression of the “white savior industrial complex.” The economist Thomas Piketty, the author of “Capital,” said simply that the donation “looks like a big joke.”
Yet philanthropic investment in global projects continues to increase. Anne Petersen, the president of the Global Philanthropy Alliance, told :
“American philanthropy used to be all about giving locally. But there’s been a dramatic trend toward international giving, and that’s only going to continue.” It’s reasonable to lament the fact that a small number of billionaires have so much power over which problems get dealt with and which do not. But they have that power precisely because they are spending so much of their money to solve global problems. We, as a country, are not.”
Read the full article on “The New Yorker” website
Learn more about Philanthrocapitalism
Related Articles
October 2015: crucial week in Geneva
10/12/2015. Peter Maurer, president of the International Committee of the Red Cross, expressed concern about the politicization of humanitarian aid which paralyzes assistance efforts.
The digital transformation of the humanitarian sector
12/05/2016. How might technology reshape humanitarian relief in the coming years, and what should we be doing to prepare?
The biggest donors of 2016
12/20/2016. Overall, some $22 billion of humanitarian spending was tracked in 2016, up from $20.9 billion in 2015, but not as high as the $23.5 billion reported in 2014.