In Defense of Philanthrocapitalism
When Mark Zuckerberg, the C.E.O. of Facebook, announced that he would be donating ninety-nine per cent of his Facebook stock to a new nonprofit organization, he got his share of positive headlines.
But the move was also dismissed as a tax-avoidance scheme, a public-relations gambit, a way to boost Facebook’s profits under the guise of doing good, and the latest expression of the “white savior industrial complex.” The economist Thomas Piketty, the author of “Capital,” said simply that the donation “looks like a big joke.”
Yet philanthropic investment in global projects continues to increase. Anne Petersen, the president of the Global Philanthropy Alliance, told :
“American philanthropy used to be all about giving locally. But there’s been a dramatic trend toward international giving, and that’s only going to continue.” It’s reasonable to lament the fact that a small number of billionaires have so much power over which problems get dealt with and which do not. But they have that power precisely because they are spending so much of their money to solve global problems. We, as a country, are not.”
Read the full article on “The New Yorker” website
Learn more about Philanthrocapitalism
Related Articles
‘Change or die’: aid charities told to stop competing for funds or face extinction
07/28/2017. Researchers warn major aid organisations will be sidelined by 2030 unless they change tack.
How to manage the migrant crisis
02/06/2016. A European problem demands a common, coherent EU policy. Let refugees in, but regulate the flow
It’s not just NGOs tackling humanitarian crises. Banks have a role too
05/19/2017. Of the 90 million people with physical disabilities around the world who need a mobility device, just one in 10 can access physical rehabilitation services.
