In Defense of Philanthrocapitalism
When Mark Zuckerberg, the C.E.O. of Facebook, announced that he would be donating ninety-nine per cent of his Facebook stock to a new nonprofit organization, he got his share of positive headlines.
But the move was also dismissed as a tax-avoidance scheme, a public-relations gambit, a way to boost Facebook’s profits under the guise of doing good, and the latest expression of the “white savior industrial complex.” The economist Thomas Piketty, the author of “Capital,” said simply that the donation “looks like a big joke.”
Yet philanthropic investment in global projects continues to increase. Anne Petersen, the president of the Global Philanthropy Alliance, told :
“American philanthropy used to be all about giving locally. But there’s been a dramatic trend toward international giving, and that’s only going to continue.” It’s reasonable to lament the fact that a small number of billionaires have so much power over which problems get dealt with and which do not. But they have that power precisely because they are spending so much of their money to solve global problems. We, as a country, are not.”
Read the full article on “The New Yorker” website
Learn more about Philanthrocapitalism
Related Articles
Safeguarding health: a global health and humanitarian priority
01/21/2015. The United Nations General Assembly passed what may become a landmark resolution calling for concerted and specific actions by States to protect health workers from violence.
Ten humanitarian crises and trends to watch in 2019
These 10 crises and trends will help shape our coverage in 2019. Here’s why they have our attention and should demand yours.
ECHO budget almost doubles – but migration strings attached
09/13/2016. The €348 million Emergency Social Safety Net (ESSN) project is the largest humanitarian grant ever made by the European Commission.



