In Defense of Philanthrocapitalism

When Mark Zuckerberg, the C.E.O. of Facebook, announced that he would be donating ninety-nine per cent of his Facebook stock to a new nonprofit organization, he got his share of positive headlines.

But the move was also dismissed as a tax-avoidance scheme, a public-relations gambit, a way to boost Facebook’s profits under the guise of doing good, and the latest expression of the “white savior industrial complex.” The economist Thomas Piketty, the author of “Capital,” said simply that the donation “looks like a big joke.”

Yet philanthropic investment in global projects continues to increase. Anne Petersen, the president of the Global Philanthropy Alliance, told  :

“American philanthropy used to be all about giving locally. But there’s been a dramatic trend toward international giving, and that’s only going to continue.” It’s reasonable to lament the fact that a small number of billionaires have so much power over which problems get dealt with and which do not. But they have that power precisely because they are spending so much of their money to solve global problems. We, as a country, are not.”

Read the full article on “The New Yorker” website

Learn more about Philanthrocapitalism


Related Articles

Peacekeepers Shouldn’t Always Be Peaceful

04/19/2018. The United Nations needs to accept that it’s possible to fight and broker peace agreements at the same time.

Hunger in Africa : our File

March 2017. Nearly 20 million people are threatened by the violent famine in Yemen, Somalia, Nigeria and South Sudan. Here is a collection of articles that will give you a non-exhaustive overview.

UN refugee agency aims to double funds for cash-based assistance to refugees by 2020

10/31/2016. The United Nations refugee agency announced its intention to double funds for cash-based assistance to refugees across the world by 2020.